Georgia Personal Injury Law: A Comprehensive Guide
- 16 sections
The general deadline for a Georgia injury lawsuit is two years (O.C.G.A. § 9-3-33), but a claim against a city needs written notice within six months (§ 36-33-5). An injured person who is 50 percent or more at fault recovers nothing (§ 51-12-33(g)). Compensatory damages have no general cap; punitive damages are capped at $250,000 except in product liability, intent-to-harm, and impairment cases (§ 51-12-5.1). Senate Bill 68, effective April 21, 2025, changed how medical bills, seat belts, and damages arguments are handled at trial.
Filing deadlines
| Claim | Deadline | What starts the clock | Statute |
|---|---|---|---|
| Personal injury | 2 years | The date the right of action accrues | § 9-3-33 |
| Wrongful death | 2 years | The date of death | § 9-3-33 |
| Medical malpractice | 2 years | The date the injury or death occurred | § 9-3-71(a) |
| Medical malpractice, outer limit | 5 years | The date of the negligent act or omission | § 9-3-71(b) |
| Damage to personal property | 4 years | The date of the damage | § 9-3-31 |
| Product liability, outer limit | 10 years | The first sale of the product for use or consumption | § 51-1-11(b)(2) |
A child’s own injury claim does not start running until age 18 (§ 9-3-90(b)); that pause does not carry over to the malpractice rules in § 9-3-73 or to the city and State notice deadlines described below.
The malpractice clock does not wait for discovery. Section 9-3-71(a) runs from the date the injury occurred, not the date the patient learned of the mistake, and the five-year limit in subsection (b) runs from the act itself. In Young v. Williams (2002), the Supreme Court of Georgia held that continuing treatment with the same doctor does not delay the start. One exception is a foreign object left in the body: the claim may be filed within one year after the object is discovered (§ 9-3-72). A child injured before age five has until two years after the fifth birthday (§ 9-3-73(b)).
The product limit has exceptions. The ten years in § 51-1-11 bar a strict liability claim regardless of when the injury happened. For negligence claims, § 51-1-11(c) keeps three paths open: a manufacturing defect that causes a disease or birth defect, conduct showing willful, reckless, or wanton disregard for life or property, and the manufacturer’s duty to warn of a danger it learns about after the sale.
Suing a city, county, or the State
A government defendant adds a notice deadline that runs before, and separately from, the two-year lawsuit deadline.
| Defendant | Notice deadline | Who receives it | Statute |
|---|---|---|---|
| City | 6 months after the event | The mayor or the chair of the city council or commission | § 36-33-5 |
| County | 12 months after the claim accrues | The county | § 36-11-1 |
| State or a state agency | 12 months after the loss was or should have been discovered | Risk Management Division of the Department of Administrative Services, with a copy to the agency | § 50-21-26 |
A city notice must state “the specific amount of monetary damages being sought” (§ 36-33-5(e)). In Dates v. City of Atlanta (2025), the Supreme Court of Georgia held that the six-month city deadline is not paused for a minor; the mother’s notice without a dollar figure failed, and her corrected notice came too late. The county statute, by contrast, gives minors and persons under a disability 12 months after the disability ends.
Claims against the State under the Georgia Tort Claims Act are capped at $1 million per person and $3 million per occurrence (§ 50-21-29(b)(1)). That cap is part of the State’s own statute; it does not apply to cities and counties, which are covered by separate immunity statutes, including § 36-92-2 for claims involving local government vehicles.
Fault: the 50 percent bar
Georgia reduces an award by the injured person’s share of fault and bars recovery entirely at 50 percent or more (§ 51-12-33(a), (g)).
| Injured person's fault | Damages found | Recovery |
|---|---|---|
| 0% | $100,000 | $100,000 |
| 25% | $100,000 | $75,000 |
| 49% | $100,000 | $51,000 |
| 50% | $100,000 | $0 |
Three more parts of § 51-12-33 decide who actually pays:
- Each defendant pays only its own share. Damages apportioned among defendants are “not a joint liability” and carry no right of contribution (§ 51-12-33(b)). If one defendant cannot pay, the injured person absorbs that share. In FDIC v. Loudermilk (2019), the Supreme Court of Georgia kept joint and several liability for defendants who acted in concert in the traditional sense, through a common plan and mutual agency.
- Fault can be assigned to someone who is not in the lawsuit. A defendant must give notice at least 120 days before trial naming the nonparty and the reason it is at fault (§ 51-12-33(d)).
- This applies even with a single defendant. House Bill 961 extended apportionment to single-defendant cases filed after May 13, 2022, in response to Alston & Bird, LLP v. Hatcher Management Holdings (2021).
What damages are capped, and what are not
| Damages | Limit in Georgia | Authority |
|---|---|---|
| Medical bills, lost wages, earning capacity | None | |
| Pain and suffering in ordinary injury cases | None | |
| Pain and suffering in medical malpractice | The $350,000 limit in § 51-13-1 cannot be applied | Atlanta Oculoplastic Surgery v. Nestlehutt (2010); Clark v. Leigh (June 2026) |
| Malpractice death verdict that includes the decedent's pre-death pain and suffering | The limit cannot be applied | Clark v. Leigh (June 2026) |
| Malpractice wrongful death award standing alone | Not decided; the Court called it "a question we do not reach today and express no opinion on" | Clark v. Leigh (June 2026) |
| Claims against the State | $1 million per person, $3 million per occurrence | § 50-21-29 |
| Punitive damages, other tort cases | $250,000 | § 51-12-5.1(g) |
Punitive damages require clear and convincing evidence of willful misconduct, malice, fraud, wantonness, oppression, or “that entire want of care which would raise the presumption of conscious indifference to consequences” (§ 51-12-5.1(b)). In Colonial Pipeline Co. v. Brown (1988), the Court said that negligence, “even gross negligence”, is not enough. The $250,000 cap has two exceptions:
| Situation | Cap | Who receives the award |
|---|---|---|
| Product liability (§ 51-12-5.1(e)) | None; one award per defendant for the same act | 75 percent to the state treasury, less a proportionate share of litigation costs and attorney's fees; the rest to the plaintiff |
| Specific intent to cause harm, or judgment substantially impaired by alcohol, drugs, or toxic vapors (§ 51-12-5.1(f)) | None, against the active tort-feasor only | The plaintiff |
| Every other tort (§ 51-12-5.1(g)) | $250,000 | The plaintiff |
What Senate Bill 68 changed in 2025
Senate Bill 68 took effect on April 21, 2025. Section 9 of the Act applies its negligent security article and its medical expense statute only to causes of action arising on or after that date, and states the intent that its other provisions apply to pending cases.
| Change | Statute | Applies to |
|---|---|---|
| A lawyer may not mention a dollar figure for pain and suffering until the close of evidence, and then only in an argument "rationally related to the evidence" | § 9-10-184 | Pending cases |
| Medical expense damages are limited to "the reasonable value of medically necessary care"; if the plaintiff has health insurance, the jury may see both the billed amounts and the amounts needed to satisfy them under the policy; letters of protection are discoverable | § 51-12-1.1 | Causes of action arising on or after April 21, 2025 |
| Failure to wear a seat belt may be evidence of negligence, comparative negligence, causation, or apportionment, and may reduce damages | § 40-8-76.1(d) | Cases commenced on or after April 21, 2025 (SB 69 § 5(c)(2)) |
| Any party may demand, before the pretrial order, a trial that decides fault first and damages second | § 51-12-15 | Pending cases |
| A plaintiff may dismiss without a court order only until the 60th day after the answer is served | § 9-11-41(a) | Pending cases |
| A new statutory framework for injuries caused by criminals on someone else's property | §§ 51-3-50 to 51-3-57 | Causes of action arising on or after April 21, 2025 |
The medical expense statute does not restrict recovery to the amount actually paid; it sets “reasonable value” as the measure and lets the jury hear both numbers. And the phased trial is not automatic: on a motion by the other side, the court may refuse it when the amount in controversy is less than $150,000 or when a sexual-offense victim would likely suffer serious distress from testifying more than once (§ 51-12-15(b)).
Medical malpractice claims
A malpractice complaint must be filed with an affidavit from an expert competent to testify, stating at least one negligent act or omission and its factual basis (§ 9-11-9.1(a)). Two time rules attach to that affidavit:
- When the limitation period is about to run. If the period will expire within ten days of filing, the attorney may file an affidavit that the firm was not retained more than 90 days before the deadline, and the expert affidavit may follow within 45 days (§ 9-11-9.1(b)).
- When the affidavit is challenged. A defendant who claims the affidavit is defective must say so by motion; the plaintiff may cure the defect by amendment within 30 days of service of that motion (§ 9-11-9.1(e)).
The two-year and five-year malpractice deadlines are in the first table above.
Car accidents
Georgia is an at-fault state: the injured person claims against the driver who caused the crash, with no no-fault threshold to meet before suing for pain and suffering. Georgia’s minimum liability limits are $25,000 per person and $50,000 per accident for bodily injury and $25,000 for property damage; § 40-9-37(a) sets them by reference to § 33-7-11(a)(1)(A).
Uninsured motorist coverage is part of every Georgia auto policy unless a named insured rejects it in writing (§ 33-7-11(a)(3)). By default it is “add-on” coverage, paid on top of the at-fault driver’s liability limits; the policyholder can choose the smaller “reduced-by” form only in writing. The seat belt change from 2025 is in the Senate Bill 68 table above.
Property owners and negligent security
The duty a property owner owes depends on why the injured person was there:
| Visitor | Duty | Statute |
|---|---|---|
| Invitee (customer, business visitor) | "Ordinary care in keeping the premises and approaches safe" | § 51-3-1 |
| Licensee (social guest) | Liability "only for willful or wanton injury" | § 51-3-2(b) |
| Trespasser | No duty except to refrain from willful or wanton injury | § 51-3-3(b) |
For an injury caused by a third person’s crime arising on or after April 21, 2025, an invitee must prove all five elements in § 51-3-51. The first is that the crime was reasonably foreseeable, shown in one of three ways: the owner had a “particularized warning of imminent wrongful conduct by a third person”; the owner had actual knowledge of prior substantially similar crimes on the premises, on adjoining property, or within 500 yards; or the owner had actual knowledge of prior substantially similar conduct by the same person who caused the injury and knew or should have known, “by clear and convincing evidence”, that the person was or would be on the premises. The other four are that the injury was a foreseeable consequence of the crime, that the crime exploited a specific physical condition of the premises known to the owner which made crime there substantially more likely than in the vicinity, that the owner failed to use ordinary care to remedy that condition, and that this failure was a proximate cause of the injury. Section 51-3-54 bars liability in listed situations, including injuries at a single-family residence and a particularized warning the owner made a reasonable effort to report to law enforcement.
Wrongful death
The surviving spouse brings the claim; if there is no spouse, the children; if neither, the parents; if none of them, the estate’s administrator or executor (§§ 51-4-2, 51-4-4, 51-4-5). The measure is “the full value of the life of the decedent”, which includes both economic contributions and the intangible value of the life. The estate has a separate claim for the person’s own losses before death, such as medical bills and pain and suffering (§ 9-2-41).
The two years run from the date of death. A pending criminal case does not extend that period for the family: in Hicks v. Universal Health Services (2022), the Court of Appeals held that parents who sued for their children’s deaths were not “victims” under the crime-victim tolling statute.
Product liability
A strict liability claim against a manufacturer reaches a product that was not merchantable and reasonably suited to its use when sold (§ 51-1-11(b)(1)). The ten-year limit runs product unit by product unit: in Burroughs v. Strength of Nature Global (2025), the Supreme Court of Georgia held that units sold less than ten years before suit could still support a claim. The punitive damages rule for product cases is in the punitive table above.
Alcohol providers
Section 51-1-40 begins from the rule that drinking, not serving, causes an intoxicated person’s harm, then allows two claims against “a person who sells, furnishes, or serves” alcohol, which includes a private host:
- Knowingly serving a person “in a state of noticeable intoxication”, or
- Willfully, knowingly, and unlawfully serving a person under 21,
in either case “knowing that such person will soon be driving a motor vehicle”, when the service is a proximate cause of the injury. The drinker cannot sue the provider for the drinker’s own injuries.
Dog bites
Georgia has no strict liability for dog bites. Under § 51-2-7, an owner may be liable when the dog is vicious or dangerous, the owner’s careless management or allowing the dog to go at liberty causes the injury, and the injured person did not provoke it. A violation of a local leash law proves only the vicious-propensity element; the rest still has to be shown.
When the injury happened in another state
A Georgia court applies the substantive law of the state where the injury happened. In Dowis v. Mud Slingers, Inc. (2005), the Supreme Court of Georgia kept that rule, lex loci delicti: “a tort action is governed by the substantive law of the state where the tort was committed.” Filing in Georgia does not, by itself, bring Georgia’s fault rule or damages rules to a crash in another state, and a court elsewhere applies its own choice-of-law rule. Deadlines are different. In Harvey v. Merchan (2021), the Court said that “[s]tatutes of limitations are generally procedural in nature, and therefore those of the forum state govern”, so a suit filed in Georgia generally runs on Georgia’s deadline. The exception is a foreign statute that “creates a cause of action that is not recognized in the common law and includes a specific limitation period”: that period governs when it is shorter than Georgia’s. Whether a Georgia court can hear the case at all, which depends on jurisdiction over the defendant and on venue, is a separate question that these rules do not answer. For two neighboring states with sharply different rules, see how Alabama’s contributory negligence rule compares with Georgia’s 50 percent bar and how Florida’s 2023 fault and damages changes compare with Georgia law.
Georgia compared with other states
Each comparison below sets Georgia’s rules beside one state’s; the note after each link names one difference it covers:
- Georgia vs Alabama: any contributory negligence bars a negligence claim.
- Georgia vs Alaska: pure comparative fault and noneconomic damages caps.
- Georgia vs Arizona: pure comparative negligence, and a constitution that forbids damages caps.
- Georgia vs Arkansas: the same 50 percent bar, and a constitution that forbids damages caps.
- Georgia vs California: pure comparative negligence and malpractice caps.
- Georgia vs Colorado: the same 50 percent bar and statutory damages caps.
- Georgia vs Connecticut: recovery at 50 percent fault and a 90-day notice for defective town roads.
- Georgia vs Delaware: local government immunity with three exceptions.
- Georgia vs Florida: a bar above 50 percent fault since 2023 and a no-fault threshold.
- Georgia vs Hawaii: a pain and suffering limit outside listed case types, and a no-fault threshold.
- Georgia vs Idaho: the injured person’s fault compared with each defendant separately.
- Georgia vs Illinois: joint liability for medical expenses.
- Georgia vs Indiana: a punitive damages cap with a state share, and a malpractice cap.
- Georgia vs Iowa: three noneconomic damages caps.
- Georgia vs Kansas: the same 50 percent bar and a punitive cap set by the judge.
- Georgia vs Kentucky: a one-year injury deadline, two years for crashes.
- Georgia vs Louisiana: a 51 percent bar since 2026.
- Georgia vs Maine: a six-year general deadline and joint liability.
- Georgia vs Maryland: contributory negligence and a noneconomic damages cap.
- Georgia vs Massachusetts: a $100,000 limit for public employers.
- Georgia vs Michigan: a no-fault threshold for pain and suffering.
- Georgia vs Minnesota: six years for negligence and shorter clocks for other claims.
- Georgia vs Mississippi: pure comparative fault and noneconomic and punitive caps.
- Georgia vs Missouri: pure comparative fault and a malpractice clock that runs from the act.
- Georgia vs Montana: a punitive cap tied to the defendant’s net worth.
- Georgia vs Nebraska: the same 50 percent line and no punitive damages.
- Georgia vs Nevada: a malpractice discovery rule that shortens the deadline.
- Georgia vs New Hampshire: no punitive damages unless a statute provides for them.
- Georgia vs New Jersey: a defendant 60 percent or more at fault pays the whole award.
- Georgia vs New Mexico: pure comparative negligence and a 90-day government notice.
- Georgia vs New York: a 2026 fault bar for no-fault crash claims.
Personal injury firms in Macon
The five firms below have Macon offices and websites that describe a personal injury practice. They are listed alphabetically. The order is not a ranking, and inclusion is not an endorsement. Each entry gives what the firm’s own website says, as read in October 2026; confirm any detail with the firm.
Adams, Jordan & Herrington, P.C.
915 Hill Park, Macon, GA 31201 · 478-743-2159
Key facts, as stated on the firm’s website: offices in Macon, Milledgeville, and Albany; case types listed include car and truck accidents, medical malpractice, VA medical malpractice, wrongful death, nursing home injuries, premises liability, and defective products; personal injury cases are taken on a contingency fee under a written fee agreement.
The Brodie Law Group
4580 Sheraton Drive, Macon, GA 31210 · (478) 239-2780
Key facts, as stated on the firm’s website: the Macon office park off I-75 at Exit 171 houses the personal injury team; the firm says it represents clients in Warner Robins, Milledgeville, Dublin, and elsewhere in Georgia from that office; personal injury cases listed include car, truck, and motorcycle accidents and catastrophic injuries; the site states “No Fee Unless We Win”.
Gautreaux Law
778 Mulberry Street, Macon, GA 31201 · 478.238.9758
Key facts, as stated on the firm’s website: Jarome Gautreaux has practiced personal injury law in Georgia since 2000 and co-authored “Georgia Law of Torts: Trial Preparation and Practice”; practice areas include auto and truck accidents, defective products, medical malpractice, nursing home abuse, premises liability, and wrongful death; personal injury cases are handled on a contingency fee basis.
Prine Law Group
740 Mulberry Street, Macon, GA 31201 · 478-257-6333
Key facts, as stated on the firm’s website: practice areas are personal injury, criminal defense, and workers’ compensation; the firm meets with clients across Bibb, Laurens, and nearby counties; personal injury clients pay no fee if there is no recovery.
Reynolds, Horne & Survant
6320 Peake Road, P.O. Box 26610, Macon, GA 31210 · (478) 405-0300
Key facts, as stated on the firm’s website: Carl Reynolds founded the firm and has represented plaintiffs in civil litigation since 1970; practice areas include car, truck, and motorcycle accidents, workers’ compensation, wrongful death, medical malpractice, products liability, nursing home negligence, and premises liability; initial consultations are free.
Before signing with any firm, it is reasonable to ask which attorney will handle the case, what the contingency percentage is at each stage, who pays case expenses if there is no recovery, and whether the firm has identified every deadline, including any government notice.
Sources
- O.C.G.A. §§ 9-2-41, 9-3-31, 9-3-33, 9-3-71, 9-3-72, 9-3-73, 9-10-184, 9-11-9.1, 9-11-41, 33-7-11, 36-11-1, 36-33-5, 40-8-76.1, 40-9-37, 50-21-26, 50-21-29, 51-1-11, 51-1-40, 51-2-7, 51-3-1 to 51-3-3, 51-3-50 to 51-3-57, 51-4-2, 51-4-4, 51-4-5, 51-12-1.1, 51-12-5.1, 51-12-15, 51-12-33, 51-13-1.
- Senate Bill 68 (2025), as passed, §§ 1, 3, 5 to 9.
- Senate Bill 69 (2025), as passed, § 5.
- Dowis v. Mud Slingers, Inc., 279 Ga. 808 (2005)
- Harvey v. Merchan, 311 Ga. 811 (2021)
- Dates v. City of Atlanta (2025)
- Young v. Williams, 274 Ga. 845 (2002)
- Atlanta Oculoplastic Surgery, P.C. v. Nestlehutt, 286 Ga. 731 (2010)
- Colonial Pipeline Co. v. Brown, 258 Ga. 115 (1988)
- FDIC v. Loudermilk, 305 Ga. 558 (2019); Alston & Bird, LLP v. Hatcher Management Holdings, LLC, 312 Ga. 350 (2021); Clark v. Leigh (Ga. June 2026); Hicks v. Universal Health Services, Inc. (Ga. Ct. App. 2022); Burroughs v. Strength of Nature Global, LLC (Ga. 2025).
General information about Georgia law as of October 2026. It is not legal advice, and reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship.